Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Opinion August 29, 2007
Search Archives



Guest editorial: The Real Lesson of World War II
Public Commentary
by Dr. Yaron Brook

In a recent speech at the Foreign Wars National Convention, President Bush defended the Iraq war, comparing it to America's actions in Japan following World War II. He argued that by sacrificing the lives of American soldiers in order to bring freedom to Japan, we were able to turn the Japanese into friends and allies; by doing the same in Iraq, we will ensure that the Iraqis one day become allies as well.

President Bush is twisting history to defend his immoral war. The real lesson of World War II is that American self-defense requires crushing and demoralizing the enemy so that it is nonthreatening not sacrificing the wealth and lives of Americans in order to spread "democracy" and make hostile nations like us.

The goal of World War II was not Japanese freedom it was the unconditional surrender of the Japanese war machine. To achieve that goal, America unleashed its full military might against Japan, smashing its infrastructure, and killing hundreds of thousands of Japanese, military and civilians.And because the Japanese had been thoroughly defeated, U.S. troops faced no Japanese insurgency.America's goal in settingthe terms and guidingthe creation ofa newstatewasto ensure that defeated Japan remained non-threatening to Americans; the goal was not a selfless mission to serve the needs of the Japanese people.

President Bush has rejected the lessons of World War II and the goal of U.S. security. Instead of eliminatingthe threat fromstates that support the cause of Islamic totalitarianism-- particularly its main sponsors in Iran and Saudi Arabia--he sent Americans on a mission to bring the vote to secular Iraq. Instead of crushing and demoralizing our enemies, Bush made our top priority protecting Iraqi civilians, Iraqi infrastructure, and Iraqi religious shrines--sacrificing American troops to that end. Instead of demanding that Iraqis embrace a pro-Western and, thus, non-threatening government, President Bush declared that they have the right to elect a government of their choosing--including a hostile,Islamic state.

President Bush is wrong. American security does not depend onbringing elections to theMiddle East--it depends on making hostile regimes in theMiddle East non-threatening. T o achieve that, we need a real war. Not one that substitutes the goal of defeating the enemy with a self-sacrificial crusade for democracy, but one that places no purpose higher than American selfdefense. A war like World War II.

The writer is executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute and a recognized Middle-East expert who has written and lectured on a variety of Middle-East issues. He served in the Israeli Army Intelligence and has discussed the Israeli-Arab conflict on radio, and television.
Reader Comments
No comments have been posted. Be the first!


Other Stories With Comments:
ArticleComments
May 16: 2008: Massapequa School Board upholds Bennett petitions after controversial hearing 2
Mets Player Ed Kranepool will be honored 1
Jones about your 401(k) options, call or visit local financial advisor today. Massapequa resident Be...1
New restaurants­- and fare- coming to MPK 1
News: March 25, 20081
PLEASE MEET: Candidates for Fire District Commissioners' seats in...1


Click ads below
for larger version